1922 БНСК Кубрат, Bulgarian National Union numbered badge # 1024, never cleaned

Description

Please, read my terms of sale to avoid any confusion (legal definitions are provided at the end):
Unless certified or in original bank packaging, then all grades are my opinion only, I am no professional grader.
For US coins, I use the online PCGS photo-grade support as well as the “Red Book” written grade criteria.
For notes, I use the Krause and other official written and detailed criteria for paper quality (whether chart or point method).
For Bulgarian coins and notes (grade, pricing) I reference the relevant BNB and local calalogs - Nikolov, Monev, Krapchev, Rakovski Numismatic Association.
Please reference the photos and
independently grade yourself
. Ask questions if needed.
This is a legal enforceable
shipment
contract, in which all sales are
final
, no returns, unless I agree otherwise.
None of my sales fall under the legal definitions of neither “trial sale”, nor “sale on approval”, nor any other kind that is not expressly defined here in writing.
All items are sold “as is”
, I make no warranties beyond the face of this contract / listing.
Evidence of integration:
This agreement is the complete agreement between the parties; no other representations have been made and parol evidence is inadmissible.
Buying from me automatically means agreeing to my terms
that cannot be overridden by anybody else (including eBay), unless I agree to that explicitly and in writing.
Feedback:
I consider the act of leaving a feedback to represent the final overall step and evaluation of a multi-step transaction and as such I leave it after the transaction is irreversibly complete. Just paying for an item is the first step of the process and the only response it triggers is simply being a prerequisite for the seller to start the next step of sending the purchased item. I will wait to make sure that delivery was successful (meaning customer received the item) and customer is satisfied (the only means of understanding that is when a positive feedback is left). In the rare case of a dissatisfaction, I will work with the customer to remedy that and reach a positive outcome. This mutual interaction will give me an overall “feel” of what feedback (if any) to leave. I am fair but allergic to drama.
Legal basis for the above statements.
Sales in US (including online sales) are governed by Article 2 of the
UCC
(Uniform Commercial Code) that
cannot be superseded
. eBay may be a mediator of disputes as long as the rules and judgements do not contradict the UCC as a rule/law of the land. No judgement, rule or guarantee (including money-back) that contradicts UCC is legal, hence enforceable.
As Per UCC definition,
I do not fall under the category of a “merchant”:
I do not have sufficient and/or constant sales volume.
I do not deal in the goods involved to earn my living (this is just a spare-time hobby).
I do not have superior knowledge or skills in the goods involved (profession, occupation, certification).
I do not employ qualified merchants.
According to UCC:
Sales
–
if no sales terms are specified, then the
presumption is that all sales are
final
, unless otherwise agreed.
Contract definition
– eBay sales are classified as “click-on agreements” and are binding and
enforceable
, once executed (button is clicked) since they represent unequivocal and unconditional acceptance (mirror image rule).
Shipping rules
– if no shipping terms are specified, then the presumption is a “shipment contract”. I explicitly specify “shipment contract” even though, by UCC, I do not have to.
Shipment contract definition
–
risk of loss transfers to buyer when
the goods are
delivered to the common carrier
(USPS, FedEx, etc.). Additionally, for non-merchant sellers transfer of risk of loss goes to the buyer upon tender (shipping is offered to be initiated).
Obligations of Common Carriers
– in a shipment contract, common carrier acts as a bailee (possession of goods without having a title) in a mutual-benefit bailment (meaning that carrier takes care of shipment for a fee). In this case bailee (carrier) has
strict liability
(definition of “strict liability” being: responsible for loss regardless of negligence, 3
rd
party action or accidents – in other words, carrier is
fully
and solely
responsible
– the only exception to this falls under the definition of “Act of God” (flood, earthquake, etc.), or “public enemies” (terrorism). Carrier’s potential
business
risk of loss has to be already factored in the amount of revenue/profits/fees charged to perform the service.
International sales
are always shipment contracts that fall under United Nations Convention for the International Sale of Goods, risk of loss passes to buyer upon
delivery to
first
carrier
for transmission to buyer (unless explicitly agreed otherwise).
Parol Evidence Rule
prevents parties who have reduced their agreement to a final written document from later introducing other evidence, such as the content of oral discussion from earlier of the negotiation process as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract.